State v. Kingham
Court of Appeals of Texas
1ConcurrenceHughes, Justice
Believing that the nature of the suit was as described by the State in its pleading, I concurred in the original opinion by this Court. 353 S.W.2d 915. I dissented on re-hearing only because I learned from an unreported opinion that the Supreme Court had passed on the question of the Trial Courts jurisdiction. Neither this opinion nor the only other case to be found on the subject, Lally v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 138 S.W.2d 1111, was cited by the Supreme Court when it reversed this Court, 361 S. W.2d 191.
I believe when this case was before this Court, and I believe now, that the nature of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Pierce v. Foreign Mission Board of Southern Baptist ConventionTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Aulanier v. GovernorTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- Zamora v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Lally v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.