Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Nash v. State
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 1992No. 92 KW 1307PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
604 So.2d 1054 (1992)
STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. Emile NASH
v.
STATE of Louisiana.
No. 92 KW 1307.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
July 29, 1992.
Office of Dist. Atty., Baton Rouge, for plaintiff.
Emile Nash, in pro. per.
WRIT DENIED: We are unable to determine from relator's application if the trial court granted his motion for production in its entirety or if the court granted the motion only as it applied to the Boykin transcript. If the trial court granted the motion in its entirety, relator should seek enforcement of that order in the court that granted it. However, if relator…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Joseph v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Clerk of CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- State Ex Rel. McKnight v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Foster v. KempLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Russell v. MorrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Wilson v. DuhonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.