Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Anson Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1929No. 618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeslie, J.

The Anson Motor Company, a partnership, filed this suit against J. A. Stephens to recover the unpaid balance on a note for $394.95, and to foreclose a chattel’ mortgage securing the same. The defendant answered by plea of non est factum, and specially alleged a material alteration of the note after its execution.

The plaintiff, by supplemental petition, replied, denying the materiality of any alteration in the note, and in • the alternative alleged that, if such alteration had been made, the same was done innocently and without any intention to defraud the maker, and-sought a recovery in any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Crescent Ins. v. CampTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Burger v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Fink v. San Augustine Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crow v. First Nat. Bank of WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Wilson v. HaginsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Puckett v. Big Lake State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Citizens' Mut. Life & Accident Ass'n of Texas v. RagleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API