Legal Opinion
United States v. Harold Samour (92-3847) and Shannon Roberts (92-3888)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1993No. 92-3847, 92-3888PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Harold Samour and Shannon Roberts appeal their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess marijuana with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Samour also appeals his additional convictions for money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) and (B)(i); travel-ling in interstate commerce in aid of a racketeering enterprise, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952 and 2; and possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We reverse Samour’s conviction for money laundering…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Charles Vinson, United States of America v. Arlie B. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Stephen Martin BeddowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Willie Joseph Causey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Puig-InfanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John R. Prince (98-6361), Tony White (98-6362)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Seneca SandridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. David E. Henley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.