Legal Opinion

Magic II, Inc. v. Dubno

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 16, 1988No. 13213PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from an assessment by the commissioner of revenue services of a use tax, which totaled $14,831 including penalty and interest, with respect to a sailing yacht owned by it. The commissioner assessed the tax under General Statutes § 12-416 on the basis of the plaintiffs failure to file a return reporting its Connecticut use tax liability under General Statutes § 12-4111 on its purchase of a yacht out-of-state for use in Connecticut. The plaintiff sought a reassessment and was granted a hearing pursuant to General Statutes § 12-418 (2). The original assessment was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. USAir, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1993
  3. Town of Berlin v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Sharper Image Corp. v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Advanced Business Systems, Inc. v. CrystalConnecticut Superior Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API