Legal Opinion

Lichty v. Hugus

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Somerset county. This was an action of assumpsit, brought January 5th 1866, by Isaac Hugus, Esq., for professional services as an attorney-at-law, against Joseph Lichty. The pleas were payment, and the Statute of Limitations. A suit was brought February 15th 1855 in the Court of Common Pleas of Somerset county, in which Joseph Lichty was one of the defendants. Hugus was his counsel in the case.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Somerset county. This was an action of assumpsit, brought January 5th 1866, by Isaac Hugus, Esq., for professional services as an attorney-at-law, against Joseph Lichty. The pleas were payment, and the Statute of Limitations. A suit was brought February 15th 1855 in the Court of Common Pleas of Somerset county, in which Joseph Lichty was one of the defendants. Hugus was his counsel in the case. A verdict and judgment were recovered against Lichty, November 14th 1856, and he removed the case to the Supreme Court. Mr. Hugus was Lichty’s counsel in that…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, July 3d 1867, by

Woodward, C. J.

— The plaintiff in error has small reason to *437complain of the answers which the court gave to his points. It surely was not erroneous to say that the Statute of Limitations would not begin to run against a hill of attorney’s fees until the dissolution of the relation betwixt him and his client. If the law were not so, every attorney to assert the statute would have to sue his clients once in six years, which would be destructive to the confidence which is essential to the relation. The point was ruled in Foster v. Jack, 4…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foster v. JackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pellettieri v. ProtopapasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  2. National Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. New Holl. Turnp. Co. v. Farmers' Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API