Legal Opinion

Yawkey v. Richardson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1862PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit. The case is sufficiently stated In the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

The action below was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error and Curtis Emerson, upon the common counts for goods sold and delivered. Evidence having been introduced to make out the plaintiffs’ ease, which had no tendency to show any but sole transactions of Yawkey, the plaintiffs, without any affidavit or statement showing inadvertence, introduced a stipulation signed by Curtis Emerson, authorizing them to discontinue as against him: and thereupon moved for leave to discontinue the suit as to Emerson, so as to leave it to proceed against Yawkey alone.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Township of La Grange v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Holbrook v. J. J. Quinlan & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  3. People ex. rel. Mabley v. Judge of the Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Munn v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Post v. ShaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API