Legal Opinion

Hardin v. Sin Claire

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1896No. S.F. No. 478PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

It is alleged in the complaint in this case that the plaintiff had been the owner and in possession of a certain described tract of land in Sonoma county, consisting of two hundred acres, continuously for thirteen years; that he had also, during the same time, been the owner and in possession of a certain described private way or road, leading from his said land over other land to a public road, which private road, during all of said time, he had used and traveled over on foot and on horseback, and -with wagons and other vehicles, claiming to own the same openly, notoriously, and…

2Cited by25 opinions

Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
California ex rel. California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
State of California v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
City of Modesto Redevelopment Agency v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.