Legal Opinion · Dissent

Woodruff Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Estate of Yarborough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 1928No. 12378Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(concurring and dissenting) :

Some of the plaintiffs in this action are judgment creditors of the estate of Daniel Yarborough, deceased; others, judgment ■ creditors of one or more of the devisees under his will. Some of the defendants are judgment creditors of said estate; other claim to be mortgage creditors of the estate; and others, judgment or mortgage creditors of certain of the devisees.

The main purpose of the action, and the only question involved in this appeal, is the construction of the will of Daniel Yarborough. In its scope the action embraces a calling in of creditors, marshaling…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. George Johnston's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Anderson v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Lilley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API