Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Anderson Township

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2009No. 2008-0691 and 2008-0817PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

I

{¶ 1} The First District Court of Appeals certified the following issue pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution and App.R. 25: “Is an order that denies a political subdivision the benefit of an alleged immunity from liability as provided in R.C. Chapter 2744 or any other provision of the law a final and appealable order when the order lacks a Civ.R. 54(B) certification?”

II

{¶ 2} George Sullivan, appellee, sued two parties: Anderson Township, appellant, and Ford Development Corporation, d.b.a. Trend Construction, an alleged subcontractor of Anderson Township. Sullivan…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wisintainer v. Elcen Power Strut Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Summerville v. City of Forest ParkOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Supportive Solutions, L.L.C. v. Electronic Classroom of TomorrowOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Riscatti v. Prime Properties Ltd. PartnershipOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Moss v. Lorain County Board of Mental RetardationOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Leasure v. Adena Local School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API