Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 2001No. 06A01-0104-PC-138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Terry R. Kincaid contends that the trial court's failure to credit him for probation served prior to granting his petition for post conviction relief violates the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Indiana Constitutions. Because we find that double jeopardy principles dictate that Kincaid should have been credited for the time served on probation under his original plea agreement, we reverse.1

Facts and Procedural History

On July 29, 1996, the State filed charges of Escape, Resisting Law Enforcement, Operating While Intoxicated, Attempted Theft,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Kincaid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kincaid v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API