Legal Opinion

United States v. Private E1 RANDY C. HERNANDEZ

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 28, 2014No. ARMY MISC 20140293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

HAIGHT, Judge:

In the general court-martial of Private (E-1) Randy C. Hernandez, real party in inter*866est, the government petitioned this court for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. Specifically, the government requested this court order the military judge “to reverse his ruling that the defense of Mistake of Fact as to Age applies to Charge II and its specification” (sodomy with a child who had not attained the age of 16 in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. KhanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  2. United States v. Sutton IIUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  3. Wilson v. United StatesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API