Legal Opinion

Washburn v. Washburn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1939No. 12661PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

1. In an ordinary life-insurance policy, where the insured names a beneficiary by revocable designation, expressly reserving the right to change the beneficiary, the beneficiary does not by such designation acquire a vested right or interest in the policy. The insured in virtue of such express provision may at will change the beneficiary in the policy. Farmers State Bank v. Kelley, 155 Ga. 733, 737 (118 S. E. 197), and cit.; Baldwin v. Wheat, 170 Ga. 449, 454 (153 S. E. 194), and cit.; 37 C. J. 579, § 345, note 55.

(a.) The insured may lose this right by agreement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Baldwin v. WheatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Glenwood Community Club Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Knight v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Reeves v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. CrozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Taylor v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API