People v. Gil
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1121Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), dated February 18, 2004, which, in effect; granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, and that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony is denied.
“[P]rompt showup identifications which are conducted in close geographic and temporal proximity to the crime are not ‘presumptively infirm,’ and in fact have generally been allowed” (People v Ortiz,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. DuuvonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Tajan v. Pavia & HarcourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. GilyardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CrumbleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.