Ekstrom United Supply Co. v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentFontron, J.
I find myself wholly unable to agree with the majority opinion which adopts a technical viewpoint unsupported, in my opinion, by our prior decisions.
The sole point to be determined on this appeal is, as stated by *637Justice Wertz in the court’s opinion, whether the plaintiff’s mechanic’s lien statement is properly verified. The verification reads:
“State of Kansas, Allen County, ss:
I do solemnly swear that I am the claimant above named and that the foregoing statement is true in every particular.
_W. L. Johnston_
“Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31st day of July, 1962.
Com. Exp: 5-3-65…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. Cydon Lodge No. 5Supreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Bridgeport Machine Co. v. McKnabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Delahay v. GoldieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Bassett v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.