Swayne v. City of Hattiesburg
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentEthridge, J.
I dissent from both the construction of the statute by the majority opinion and the constitutionality of the stat ute with this construction placed upon it. I do not know whether I can strengthen the dissenting opinion in Stingily v. City of Jackson, 140 Miss. 57, 104 So. 465 et seq., hut the question is so important that I feel called upon to make some .additional observations upon these propositions :
In the .first place, I think the statute -authorizing the improvement to be made against the abutting property was intended solely to be applied where the abutting property was equally…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.