Legal Opinion
Vapor Blast Mfg. Co. v. Pangborn Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1950No. 6175_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, Vapor Blast Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called Vapor) and A. H. Eppler, instituted a civil action in the United States District Court of the District of Maryland, against the Pang-born Corporation (hereinafter called Pang-born), alleging infringement by Pangbom o'f the Eppler patent, No. 2,462,480. Only claims 15 and 21 of the patent are here in suit. The District Judge concluded:
“Summarizing our conclusions they are: (1) Defendant’s device infringes both of the claims of the Eppler patent in suit, numbers 15 and 21; (2) these claims are sufficiently…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carl Otto v. Koppers Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Wheeling Steel Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Charles R. Pollard, Jr., D. B. A. Lytron Distributing Company, and Plastoid Corporation v. American Phenolic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Black & Decker Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Bulldog Electric Products Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1952
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Bulldog Electric Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.