Legal Opinion
Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 25, 2009No. Civ. 07-333-SLR, 07-348-SLR, 07-409-SLR, 07-765-SLRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the court is defendant Wyeth’s (“Wyeth”) motion to disqualify Howrey LLP (“Howrey”) from representing plaintiffs Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed Inc. in the above-captioned cases. 1 (D.I. 184) 2 The court conducted an evidentiary hearing on July 22, 2009 (the “hearing”). 3 For the reasons that follow, the court denies the motion to disqualify.
II. BACKGROUND
Wyeth is a global pharmaceutical company with multiple divisions and subsidiaries. (D.I. 247 at 35; DX 27 (excerpt of Wyeth’s 2008…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Cohen v. OasinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Boy Scouts of America v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Wyeth v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Dr. Falk Pharma Gmbh v. Generico, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Davila v. Peralta, Sr.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Harbour Antibodies BV v. Teneobio, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.