SHADDY v. Department of Labor
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Dissent
Reiber, C.J.,
¶ 13. dissenting. Because the ALJ was well within his discretion to limit the evidence to the events of January 19 and 20,2008, under our deferential standard of review I would affirm the holding of the Employment Security Board.
¶ 14. The majority’s holding ignores the limited role assigned to this Court in this appeal. We have previously noted that we will affirm the findings of the Employment Security Board if they are “supported by any credible evidence in the record.” Whitcomb v. Dep’t of Employment & Training, 147 Vt. 525, 528, 520 A.2d 602, 604 (1986) (emphasis added).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haynes v. Golub Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources v. Upper Valley Regional Landfill Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Harrington v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Keus v. Brooks Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Langlois v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.