Legal Opinion
Gardner Ex Rel. Gardner v. Chrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1996No. 95-3255PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
Cindy Gardner suffered an acute fronto-temporal intracranial hemorrhage resulting in permanent brain damage which has confined her to a wheelchair after an automobile accident. In this action, she contends defendant Chrysler Corporation defectively designed the pedestal-mounted, high-backed front seat upon which she was seated because it failed to provide essential protection for her in a modest rear-end collision. In fact, Ms. Gardner was trajectiled into the third rear passenger seat. It is controversial whether this occurred at the moment of the collision or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Tina BARRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Lewis R. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Navarre v. Luna (In Re Luna)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Abuan v. Level 3 Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Comer v. Preferred Risk Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.