Legal Opinion

Pinchbeck v. Department of Public Health

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 21, 2001No. AC 20125PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The plaintiff, Kristine Pinchbeck,1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her action for a declaratory judgment, which she brought following the denial by the defendant department of public health (department) of her request for intervenor status in the department’s evaluation and approval of a sewage disposal system that had been proposed by the defendants Gary Friedlaender and Linda Friedlaender (Friedlaenders).2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) determined that she lacked standing to bring a declaratory judgment action pursu*203ant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Town of West Hartford v. MURTHA CULLINAConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Rosengarten v. DownesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Pinchbeck v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Weihing v. DodsworthConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. Stefanoni v. Department of Economic & Community DevelopmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API