Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Tulley v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1972No. 72-623PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curia/m.

First, with respect to the duty of the Secretary of State to transmit to the boards of elections all part-petitions, we note that Section 1(g) of Article II of the Ohio Constitution requires an affidavit by the solicitor of signatures to each part-petition, and it is explicitly required that such affidavit contain a recital by the affiant of the fulfillment of certain duties required of him. The Secretary of State, in his answer, states that his reason for not forwarding certain part-petitions was that they were not verified in accordance with the constitutional requirements.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern v. GuckenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hodges v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cappelletti v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API