Starr v. Whitcomb
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Garnishment proceedings by Mary B. L. Starr against Edgar B. Whitcomb as garnishee defendant of James Vaughan. There was an order quashing the proceedings, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Plaintiff obtained judgment against a bankrupt upon his cognovit and, nearly a year after the adjudication of bankruptcy, began the pending garnishment proceeding, filing an affidavit in the usual form. Without filing a disclosure, the garnishee defendant moved for an order quashing the garnishment proceeding. No issue was framed, the court below granted the motion, and the plaintiff in garnishment assigned error. The validity of plaintiff’s judgment and her standing as a creditor whose demand will survive the discharge of the bankrupt are not questioned. It is the contention of counsel for…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Brotherton Co. v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Taber v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Borderland Coal Sales Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Barber v. WiemerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917