Legal Opinion

Strauss v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 8, 1932No. M-201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The plaintiff, a retired rear admiral of the Navy, was recalled to active duty and served as a member of the submarine board during the period from June 29, 1928‘, to March 30,1929. The question here concerns his right to the difference between the retired pay received by him and the active duty pay provided for under the statutes.

This question has heretofore been passed upon by this court in Hugh Rodman v. United States, 70 C. Cls. 751. It was there decided that the right to the difference in the pay was provided for by the act of August 29, 1916 (39 Stat. 581), and was not repealed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. Rodman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Briggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  2. Capps v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API