Legal Opinion

Talsky v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1961No. S. F. No. 20412PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

The Public Utilities Commission on June 4, 1958, instituted an investigation on its own motion into the operations and practices of Babe Talsky doing business as Beliable Delivery Service. The business was operated as a sole proprietorship from 1936 to August 1959, when it was incorporated as Beliable Delivery Service, Inc., with Talsky as the sole stockholder. Following hearings in 1958 and 1959, the commission on October 6, 1959, entered its order directing Talsky and the corporation to cease and desist from operating as a highway common carrier between a large number of designated cities…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Samuelson v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Nolan v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Alves v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Souza v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. RyersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. John Costello, as Trustee of the Estate of Arthur W. Baxter v. Safeway Stores IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API