Burt v. John Deere Waterloo Tractor Works of Deere Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtLarson, J.
Claimant Russell Burt, a married man with _three children, was employed by defendant at the time of the alleged injury to his lungs. Although five errors are assigned under three divisions there is essentially but one question presented: Is there any substantial evidence that claimant’s lung condition arose out of and in the course of his employment?
His employment for the last 6% years at 8 hours a day as a “spot-blaster” is conceded. There is no contradiction of his testimony that in 1953 the first symtoms of illness he recognized were a “tired and aching feeling.” and he could cough up…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Almquist v. Shenandoah Nurseries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Reddick v. Grand Union Tea Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Hinrichs v. Davenport Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Pohler v. T. W. Snow Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lakeside Casino v. BlueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Cedar Rapids Community School v. CadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Holmes v. Bruce Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- 2800 CORP. v. FernandezSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Bodish v. Fischer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.