Legal Opinion

Lane v. I.U.O.E Stationary Engineers

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1989No. C005488PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, Acting P. J.

This is a pleading case and the question on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously sustained a demurrer without leave to amend. The question turns upon whether a labor union, voluntarily representing one of its members in a disciplinary hearing before a municipal civil service board, had a duty of care and, if so, upon the nature of such duty. We conclude that under the facts alleged the union owed its member a duty akin to that of fair representation and such a duty would be breached if the union acted arbitrarily, discriminatorily or in bad faith.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Setliff v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Jones v. OmnitransCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Hussey v. Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Paulsen v. Local No. 856 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API