Legal Opinion
Rackman v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 13, 2000No. 1:97-cr-00003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM & ORDER 1
AMON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are defendant’s motions for partial summary judgment on the issue of claim construction and for summary judgment of non-infringement and plaintiffs cross-motion on the issue of infringement. The claim language is construed as set out below. Neither party is entitled to summary judgment at this time.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brought the instant action on January 2, 1997, alleging that certain of defendant’s products and services infringe his patent, United States Patent No. 4,670,857, entitled “Cartridge-Controlled System…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mich & Mich TGR, Inc. v. BrazabraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Hale Propeller, L.L.C. v. Ryan Marine Products Pty., Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Intel Corp. v. ALTIMA COMMUNICATIONS INC.District Court, E.D. California · 2003