Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Trawitzki

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2001No. 99-2234-CRPublished

1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 47. (dissenting). At issue in this case is the permissible unit of prosecution under the theft statute, Wis. Stat. § 943.20. I believe that the permissible unit of prosecution for theft is found in the statutory definition of the crime. In examining the statutory definition, I conclude that the legislature did not intend that two discrete violations of the theft statute be parsed into fifteen separate charges.

¶ 48. Yet, the majority ignores the unit of prosecution defined by the statute and determines the unit of prosecution to be the number of firearms stolen. In defining the underlying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Sartin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. TrawitzkiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API