Legal Opinion

Robbins, Neal Hampton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 2016No. WR–73,484–02PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Having granted the State's motion for rehearing in this case, and having considered its merits, we now conclude that the State's motion for rehearing was improvidently granted. We deny the State's motion for rehearing. No further motions will be entertained.

Alcala, J., filed a concurring opinion.

Richardson, J., filed a concurring opinion in which Johnson, J., joined.

Newell, J., filed a concurring opinion.

Meyers, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

CONCURRING OPINION

Alcala, J., filed a concurring opinion.

I join this Court's order because its effect is to grant Neal Hampton Robbins, applicant, the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brent, Lakesia KeyonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021
  2. Brian Philip Manookian v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Richard J. Malouf, D.D.S. v. the State of Texas Ex Rels. Christine Ellis, D.D.S. and Madelayne CastilloTexas Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Tavario Jermaine Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2020
  5. Tavario Jermaine Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API