Legal Opinion

Medin v. Brookfield

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1938No. File No. 8107PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P. J.

Plaintiff, executor of the last will and testament of Charles Rosengren, deceased, commenced this action in the circuit court of Minnehaha County to foreclose a real estate mortgage. Admitting execution and delivery of the note and mortgage, defendants in their answer affirmatively allege that decedent “in consideration of the defendants having paid interest on said note and mortgage for many years made a gift to the defendants herein of any unpaid amount that might be due on said note and mortgage at the time of his death and in execution of said gift executed and delivered a satisfaction in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Fleming v. ParrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  3. Chappell v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  4. Fouts v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. McNabb v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Kaspari's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Brown v. WarnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Scott v. LiechtiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sprenger v. SprengerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Johnston v. ErikksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API