Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Pedro Reyes v. State of Rhode Island

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 11, 2016No. 2014-161-AppealPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Justice GOLDBERG,

with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part. '

I join the majority’s well-written opinion clarifying this Court’s standard of review of a hearing justice’s summary dismissal of an applicant’s postconviction-relief (PCR) application and its affirmance of the hearing justice’s summary dismissal of Reyes’s claim that his 1994 nolo contendere plea violated Rule 11 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure and was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.1 I *662also unhesitatingly join the majority’s insightful decision to abrogate the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Martin Rivera-Gomez v. Rafael Adolfo De CastroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. McGrath v. KristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API