Citibank v. Hull
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, J.,
Plaintiff, Citibank, N.A., pleads facts which it hopes will support an “account stated” cause of action against Mr. Hull, as an alleged credit card debtor, plaintiff, a national banking association engaged in consumer lending, avers that defendant obtained *190extensions of credit from plaintiff or its predecessor in interest by means of a credit card account. See plaintiff’s complaint, filed April 9, 2012, at ¶¶3-4. Defendant has preliminarily objected, pursuant to rule 1028 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure on the bases that (1) the complaint does not state any date when…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Steiner v. MarkelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Pike County Hotels Corp. v. KieferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Toney v. Chester County HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.