Legal Opinion
State v. Crandall
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 20, 1994No. 90-131PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The State appeals from the trial court’s suppression of all evidence obtained from the stop and search of a vehicle occupied by defendants Wayne and Donna Crandall. We remand for further fact-finding by the trial court.
I
On Wednesday, March 15, 1989, Officer Gary Briggs met with an informant who volunteered information about persons he believed were dealing drugs in the Bennington area. The informant named Wayne and Donna Crandall, told Briggs where they lived, identified some of their customers, and made a number of predictions about how and when the Crandalls would next purchase drugs. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Armando Chaidez, Lilia Silva, and Manuel ChaviraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BoyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- State v. JesticeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State v. RutterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.