Legal Opinion
Gulko v. General Motors Corp.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided November 6, 1997No. C.A. 94C-12-285 SCDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Del PESCO, Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Anna Gulko has filed a motion to amend the complaint in her action against General Motors Corporation (“GM”). In particular, she seeks to add claims of defective “design and manufacture of the shoulder/seatbelt apparatus” and the “failure to design, manufacture, assemble, and offer for sale the said vehicle with a passenger-side airbag.” Generally, a motion to amend is permitted liberal construction under Superior Court Civil Rule 15(a). 1 Because Ms. Gulko’s motion claiming defective design of the shoulder/seatbelt apparatus is a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Patricia M. Wood v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.W. Financial Services, S.A. v. Empire Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Prince v. Ferritto, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019