Legal Opinion

United States v. Two Plastic Drums, More Or Less Of An Article Of Food, Labeled In Part: Viponte Ltd. Black Currant Oil Batch No. Boosf 039

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 31, 1993No. 92-1172PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

984 F.2d 814

61 USLW 2491

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TWO PLASTIC DRUMS, MORE or LESS OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD,

LABELED IN PART: VIPONTE LTD. BLACK CURRANT OIL

BATCH NO. BOOSF 039, etc., and Traco

Labs, Incorporated,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-1172.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Oct. 21, 1992.

Decided Jan. 27, 1993.

Rehearing Denied March 31, 1993.

Douglas Letter, Robert D. Kamenshine (argued), Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Appellate Section, Washington, DC, Leslie Kux, Food & Drug Admin., Rockville, MD, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert Ullman (argued), Jacob…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Food and Drug Administration's Discretion to Approve Methods of Detection and to Define the Term "No Residue" Pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API