Legal Opinion

The Food and Drug Administration's Discretion to Approve Methods of Detection and to Define the Term "No Residue" Pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided October 13, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Food and Drug Administration’s Discretion to Approve Methods of Detection and to Define the Term “ No Residue” Pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act The Food and Drug Administration has the discretionary authority under the DES proviso to the Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the use of an additive in animal feed if the FDA concludes that there is no method that can “ reliably measure and confirm” whether the additive contains residues o f carcinogenic concern at or above the “ no res­ idue” level. Where the FDA has already approved a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API