Legal Opinion

Stansbery v. Medo-Land Dairy, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1940No. 27950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

Plaintiff, D. C. Stansbery, as assignee of all money due or to become due from defendant, Medo-Land Dairy, Inc., under and by virtue of a contract entered into on August 9, 1937, whereby it was agreed that Hollywood Dairy Farm, Inc., Grace Gevurtz, and Eldon Pickard would sell to defendant all the milk produced from Hollywood Farms and a farm known as the Willows, brought this action against defendant to recover the sum of $4,056.14, which it is alleged the defendant wrongfully deducted and paid out of the funds due for milk delivered under the contract, and to which plaintiff was entitled…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Dial v. Inland Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Association Collectors, Inc. v. HardmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Young v. American Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Morris v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Paullus v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Fricker v. Uddo & Taormina Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Equilease Corporation v. State Federal Savings and Loan Association, a Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. St. Mary's Bank v. CianchetteDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API