Legal Opinion
Riggins v. Hinchman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 25, 1885No. 3464Published
Appeal from McLennan County. (Transferred from, Austin.J j
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hurt, J.
§ 30. Liquidated damages; penalty; rules as to; contract construed to provide for liquidated damages. Hinchman brought this suit to recover against Riggins for a breach of the following contract in writing, viz.:
“This agreement, made and entered into this the 20th day of August, A. D. 1879, by and between A. Hindu *51man of the first part, and N. B. and J. W. Biggins of the second part, all of the city of Waco, witnesseth: That for and in consideration of the party of the first part purchasing from the parties of the second part seven (J) Tennessee wagons, all complete, except…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bagley v. . PeddieNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Dunlop v. . GregoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Cushing v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Webbers' Executors v. UnderhillNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Penley v. RecordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876