Legal Opinion

Riggins v. Hinchman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1885No. 3464Published

Appeal from McLennan County. (Transferred from, Austin.J j

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 30. Liquidated damages; penalty; rules as to; contract construed to provide for liquidated damages. Hinchman brought this suit to recover against Riggins for a breach of the following contract in writing, viz.:

“This agreement, made and entered into this the 20th day of August, A. D. 1879, by and between A. Hindu *51man of the first part, and N. B. and J. W. Biggins of the second part, all of the city of Waco, witnesseth: That for and in consideration of the party of the first part purchasing from the parties of the second part seven (J) Tennessee wagons, all complete, except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bagley v. . PeddieNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Dunlop v. . GregoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Cushing v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Webbers' Executors v. UnderhillNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  5. Penley v. RecordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API