Dunlop v. . Gregory

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] It is contended on the part of the appellants, that the agreement on which this suit is brought is in restraint of trade, prejudicial to the public interests and against public policy; and that if valid at the time of its execution, it was invalid at the time of its breach, because the partnership for whose benefit it was made had expired without assigning it.

Contracts, upon whatever consideration made, which go to the total restraint of trade, such as obligate…