Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garnett v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 12, 1993No. 3 September Term, 1993Published

1DissentRobert M. Bell, Judge

“It may be possible to conceive of legislation ... so flagrantly in conflict with natural right, that the courts may set it aside as unwarranted, though no clause of the constitution can be found prohibiting it. But the cases must be rare indeed; and whenever they do occur the interposition of the judicial veto will rest upon such foundations of necessity that there can be little or no room for hesitation.”

Richard G. Singer, The Resurgence of Mens Rea: III — The Rise and Fall of Strict Criminal Liability, 30 B.C.L.Rev. 337, 368 (1989), quoting State v. Clottu, 33 Ind. 409, 410-11 (1870).

I do…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API