Legal Opinion

Insley v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1939No. Appeal, 422PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

Plaintiff, an insurance agent, brought an action in assumpsit against defendant, the State Mutual Life Assurance Company, for an accounting of renewal commissions alleged to be due him by the defendant.

Under a written contract dated May 1, 1923, plaintiff, in partnership with J. Elerick Willing, was employed as general agent by defendant and became entitled to commissions on the initial premiums on policies he wrote and also on the renewal premiums for a period of fourteen years. In September, 1924, the plaintiff and Willing dissolved their partnership and resigned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Portuguese-American Bank of San Francisco v. WellesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Morgan v. GambleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Gillespie Tool Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. National Cash Register Co. v. Modern Transfer Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Central Penn National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Spatz v. NasconeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API