Legal Opinion

Wargo v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1954No. Appeal, 178PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Plaintiff was a passenger in a street car, operated by the Pittsburgh Railways Company, which collided with a truck driven by the additional defendant, Martin. His head banged against the side of the car, his back, hip and head were injured and he had bruises or cuts on Ms face, arm and leg which were of minor character. As a result of this collision, plaintiff claims that he had and still has severe pain in his back; that he is nervous; that he had dizziness and headaches which persisted until the trial; that he had running ears; and that he was permanently injured…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. King v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Nestor v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Dupont v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Sherman v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Washko v. Ruckno, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API