Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 9, 2009No. 90-162CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYNN J. BUSH, Judge.

The court has before it cross-motions for summary judgment filed under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). These motions concern the “driving time” overtime pay claims of approximately 6400 federal law enforcement officer plaintiffs in these consolidated cases. Resolution of these driving time claims has been significantly delayed to permit appellate review of the denial of similar claims, and to afford plaintiffs an opportunity to marshal facts that would distinguish these driving time claims from those repeatedly rejected by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API