Legal Opinion
Haring v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 22 Vroom 386.
1Per curiam
We agree with the opinion of the Supreme Court except so far as it construes the act of March 30th, 1887. It is unnecessary to pass upon that part of the opinion, because we find the act to be unconstitutional.
Let the judgment below be affirmed..For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Mague, Reed, Scudder, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 9.
For reversal—None.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bushman v. BushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- Mayer v. Oxidation Products Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Kerlin v. MaherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Coyle v. Succession of CreevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1882