Smith v. Union Switch & Signal Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 53, April T., 1901, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., JulyT., 1900, No. 36, on bill in equity in case of Robert C. Smith v. The Union Switch and Signal Company. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court decreed that the defendant should remove the fence complained of in the bill. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
By deed of Eliza Lewis et al., the plaintiff became the owner in 1884 of one and one fourth acres of land described by undisputed metes and bounds, and of an easement described in the said deed in the following words: “ Together with the right of ingress and egress thereto and therefrom to and from said *447Braddock’s field road upon and over said strip of ground thirty-six feet in width, owned by the said parties of the first part, and adjoining and extending along the eastward side of the premises hereby granted from the said Braddock’s field road to the line of lands now…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Quicksall v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Commonwealth v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- City of Pittsburg v. Epping-Carpenter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Commonwealth v. ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Higgins v. Borough of SharonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carroll v. AsburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Wickham v. TwaddellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Wakeling v. CockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Jackson v. Sarajean Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1930
- Logan v. BauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915