Legal Opinion

Wickham v. Twaddell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1904No. Appeal, No. 167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 167, Oet. T., 1902, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Chester Co., No. 392, in equity, dismissing bill in equity in case of Henry Wickham v. John P. Twaddell. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinionby

W. D. Porter, J.,

The plaintiff and defendant are residents and property owners in the unincorporated town of Devon, located in East-town township, Chester county, Pennsylvania, and both claim title through Coffin and Altemus, the dedicators of the “Plan of Devon.” The plaintiff seeks to have the defendant enjoined from occupying for private purposes and excluding the public from certain portions of Dorset and Exeter avenues, and maintaining fences and hedges within the lines of said streets as dedicated by their common predecessors in title. The learned judge of the court below found…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Quicksall v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Appeal of FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Hill v. EpleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  5. Manbeck v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. AsburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. McGuire v. Wilkes-BarreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. Wilson Snyder Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Philadelphia v. BilyeuSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Black v. Pittsburg & Butler Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API