Legal Opinion
Anderson Development Company, a Michigan Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Travelers Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1995No. 93-2140, 93-2166PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J., joined by Boggs, J.,
RYAN, J., (pp.- — ), delivered a separate concurring opinion and concurred in the judgment.
BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge.
The insured, Anderson Development Company (“ADC”), brought a declaratory judgment action against its insurer, Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”), seeking coverage under its insurance policies for costs of defense and indemnification resulting from a government mandated clean-up. Applying Michigan law, the district court granted summary judgment in part for the insurer, Travelers, holding that under the policies, Travelers was not required to provide a defense or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Elaine Deaton v. Montgomery County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Leo LaPOINTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AUTOWORKERS LOCAL 600, and Doug Thompson, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Boardman Petroleum, Inc. v. Federated Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.