Legal Opinion
State v. Byrum
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1987No. 15189PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
Defendant, Daniel T. Byrum (Byrum), appeals from his conviction for distribution of LSD in violation of SDCL 22-42-2. Byrum was convicted of two counts of distribution of LSD after a two-day jury trial. We affirm.
On or about November 11, 1984, Kevin Langdon (Langdon) was hitchhiking in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, when he was picked up by Byrum and William Smith (Smith). Smith is Byrum’s brother-in-law. The conversation between the three men eventually turned to marijuana and other drugs. According to Langdon and Smith, the conversation then turned to the question of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ClabaughSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Randolph BosleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RufenerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WaltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.