Legal Opinion

State v. Rufener

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1987No. 15039PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice (on rehearing).

This case comes before us on a petition for rehearing. The original opinion was filed August 13, 1986. State v. Rufener, 392 N.W.2d 424 (S.D.1986) (Rufener I). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new trial.

In his petition for rehearing, Rufener urges three separate contentions. Initially, Rufener claims that this court incorrectly upheld the trial court’s refusal of a requested accomplice instruction. Secondly, Rufener contends that this court erroneously upheld the trial court’s admission of evidence, specifically the pistol and marijuana found…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. George Samuel Walter RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Theodore D. MorlangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Clinton WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. RufenerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. AshkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. LodermeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. JaquesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. LaPlanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API